Citizens Go After Charleston Mayor's Surety Bond, Serve Letter of Intent
John Tecklenburg Was Served Papers At His "Coffee With The Mayor" Event In Downtown Charleston, SC
Please Consider
SupportingThe Overton Report By Donating
Here!
Every so often, Charleston Mayor John Tecklenburg holds a “Q&A” he calls “Coffee With The Mayor.” He was surprised this week at that event with news informing him that citizens were going after his surety bonds, a move that had been sweeping the country recently as a way to get corrupt politicians out of office. We will follow this as it continues and keep you updated!
Scroll down to read the document in its entirety.
During the event, John Tecklenburg was served papers that included the charges being levied against him. We hope to speak with the people who are leading this effort, and when we do, we will be following up on this story.
The letter of intent that Charleston citizens served to Mayor John Tecklenburg reads as follows:
Mayor John J Tecklenburg. We intend to file against your Surety Bond and all your liability Insurance policies for abdicating your responsibilities as a mayor, and for breaking your oath of office. Additionally, directives imposed upon the citizens under your administration violate our Constitutional rights, South Carolina Law, Federal law, and The Nuremburg code.
The list of charges hereby stated below:
1. The citizens of Charleston charge John J Tecklenburg with endangering its citizens, obstructing justice, and conspiring to commit acts of terrorism. On May 30th 2020 you gave our police chief Stand Down orders as an emotionally volatile group marched unrestrained towards King Street. It was obvious the rioters would destroy property and terrorize citizens. City ordinance as per article 2 section 25-16 code 1975, 43-1: 1,1-24-78 states the police department shall, by law, have the responsibility of providing the city with a professional public service to facilitate the reduction of crime… as per article, 2, section 25-17 code 1975 43-2: ord. No. 178-12, 1, 1-24-78. The police department shall, by law, have the responsibility of …apprehension of criminals….” As per article 2, section 25-17 code 1975, 43-2; Ord. No 1978-12, 1, 1-24-78. SC code section 23-13-280 states that the sheriff’s deputies shall take into custody and carry before the nearest magistrate any person who engages in riotous conduct or in violation of peace. Your Stand Down order obstructed our police force from doing their job. King Street business and restaurant owners were shocked as their windows were smashed, stores looted, and buildings torched. There were fights, gunshots, and police cars set on fire with twelve documented accounts of BLM members waving handguns. We have video and a 64-page report articulating the tragedy of the domestic terror activities of this event including a record of the hundreds of thousands of dollars damage. Charleston police regularly block King Street for shopping events and festivals. They are trained and able to intervene. Your Stand Down order withdrew police protection from the citizens causing people to fend for themselves. In doing so you abdicated your responsibilities to maintain peace and safety in the city. We have seen this same game plan play out in other cities across the USA. Your Stand Down order was preplanned and politically motivated. You and your wife are friends with BLM members, connect with them on Facebook, and you often organize fund raisers for BLM. Why didn’t you call the leaders of BLM and give them a Sand Down order? We charge you with Conspiring to commit acts of Terrorism 18 USC 2339, and conspiring to criminal commercial activity 15 USC 1-3.
2. The Citizens of Charleston charge you with Imposing illegal lockdowns and unlawful mandates. The lockdowns and mandates could not and did not curtail the spread of an airborne virus. They were very effective at creating fear and confusion, extremely successful if the goal was to increase government power. These measures stripped Charleston residents of their liberties and caused substantial financial damage to business owners. You tricked the public into believing you have the authority to make laws. You are NOT a lawmaker. The City Council members are NOT lawmakers. The mandates have no standing within the law. The supreme legislative power in the state is vested in the South Carolina Assembly. A local government cannot declare a state of emergency. Everyone enforcing mandates is participating in a fraud against the citizens and violating established laws. US code 21 of federal regulations section 50 23 & 24. It is illegal to coerce citizens to participate in an experiment. Masks, PCR tests, and Covid injections are EUA experimental devices. US 18 code section 2331 defined domestic terrorism as activities dangerous to human life that are in violation of the criminal laws of the United States intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion. Forcing a citizen to wear a mask to participate in society or to obtain an education is coercion. Requiring vaccine passports to enter public buildings is coercion. Using police to enforce mandates is intimidation. Under your Covid response directives, City Council members, eager to protect its citizens, formed a mask mandate enforcement team. This team was comprised of non-city employees. They were given orders to ticket unmasked citizens. We have video of these thugs aggressively assaulting citizens and tourist alike. Did you hire any BLM members as mandate enforcers? Under your leadership, the citizens have witnessed our liberties and our justice system destroyed. Per your inverted justice, dangerous rioters are not detained while tax paying law-abiding citizens are targeted and harassed by mandate enforcers.
3. The citizens of Charleston charge you with child endangerment, negligence, coercion, violating South Carolina Laws, Federal Laws and violating the Nuremburg code of 1947. As the Mayor, it’s your responsibility to follow the laws of South Carolina. If a school district is in violation of South Carolina law, it is your duty to require them to comply with the laws of our state. You have supported the School Board’s decision to force masks on children in disregard of state law. In doing so you condoned unlawful activity, emboldened the school district officials, and broken your oath. The state of South Carolina Supreme Court on September 2nd 2020 unanimously upheld proviso 1.108. It states the ultimate decision to mask a child is the parents’ choice, not the local governments or school boards. The supreme legislative power in the state is vested in the South Carolina Assembly, not local government. Attorney General, Alan Wilson, states “any parent or taxpayer has the right to bring a civil lawsuit against cities, school districts, teachers, administrators, and or other school staff for ignoring this decision, which means they could be subject to fines and attorney’s’ fees as a body and individually. The Parents of Charleston are witnessing city officials and school administrators disregard our constitutional rights and violate the laws of our state. Your administration is colluding with school administrators who are enforcing illegal policies. Why are City Council members meeting with the school administrators discussing vaccines? The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by the State. This protection is provided in the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. Every citizen has a fundamental right granted by the U.S. Constitution to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children without government interference. We did not give our consent or put ourselves, or our children, under the jurisdiction of your administration or the CDC. The Constitution is the Supreme Law of The Land. Any law, rule, order or mandate that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and Void. Code 21 of Federal Regulation section 50, 23 & 24 states it is illegal to coerce citizens to participate in an experiment. Forced masks to obtain an education is coercion. All the mandates and covid procedures your administration and the school board are forcing are listed as (EUA) experiments. Enforcing them violates a citizens’ rights to free expression and speech granted under the South Carolina Constitution and the US Constitution. You have received peer reviewed scientific studies from international virologist, scientist, and doctors with evidence that masks cause neurodegenerative damage, bacterial infections, carbon dioxide poisoning, as well as numerous psychological disorders. The evidence also proves Covid has NEVER been isolated, and the masks do not prevent transmission of Covid. The recent policy of quarantining healthy children is not only unconscionable but it violates universal human rights protected by law. The PCR test cannot determine covid from the flu or a cold. Requiring PCR test results to participate in public activities violates HIPPA Laws. The PCR tests have been fraudulently used to achieve false positive results to create fear inorder to control the population. Our schools are using the PCR test to quarantine healthy children and pave the way for mandatory vaccines. The mandate enforcement pressure is designed to scare, confuse, and subjugate parents and children. It is a form of psychological warfare. ALL Covid mandates are an orchestrated effort to subject the population to authoritarian rule. Not one prevents the transmission of viral infections. Money and control are the motives behind the mandate madness. Your administration is lock step with a plan that is harmful and dangerous to our republic and all future generations. This nation is based upon the “Rule of Law” and not on arbitrary and capricious “orders”, “rules “, “dictates”, or “mandates”, repugnant to the Constitution. You are in Violation of the Child Endangerment which defines endangerment as any act or omission that renders a child to psychological, emotional or physical abuse
a. https://rumble.com/vgk92l-masks-the-science-and-myths.html Masks: The Science & Myth
b. https://rumble.com/vljvhn-mask-science-1-how-wearing-masks-spread-viruses-an bacteria-worse-than-not.html How Wearing Masks Spread Viruses and Bacteria
c. https://rumble.com/vrxp5n-new-documentary-on-the-pcr-test-deception PCR test deception
d. https://rumble.com/vubn66-situation-update-2722.html SITUATION UPDATE 2/7/22 world update
e https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/
f. https://rumble.com/vscoit-dr-kary-mullis-exposes-the-current-pcr-testing-scam.ht ml Dr Kary Mullis inventor of PCR test exposes the current PCR testing scam
4. The citizens of Charleston charge you with assault with a deadly weapon, and practicing medicine without a license. The definition of a weapon “A deadly weapon shall include any weapon, device or instrument article or substance that is used or attempted to be used, or threatened to be used capable of death or substantial bodily harm” You have received ample amount of peer reviewed, scientific proof, that the vaccines do not prevent a person from contracting Covid and do not prevent a person from transmitting the virus to others. The evidence proves these injections can be extremely harmful. Both the EU and the WHO have recommended a cease in all Covid vaccinations due to the high rate of crippling and deadly side effects. Big Pharma billionaires have misrepresented the vaccines effectiveness and silenced the negative side effects. These companies are involved in paying elected government officials to push their drugs. The PCR tests, mandates, social distancing, quarantines “recommended” by the CDC were designed to scare the population into compliance. Mandating any of these measures breaks South Carolina law, The Constitution, and the Nuremberg Code. No government has authority to compel forced experimental devices to include vaccinations by intimidation or by restriction of activities. Coercion or compulsion of any medical procedure is unlawful without freely given informed consent. Loss of employment is coercion NOT consent. You have not provided the citizens with research on the effectiveness of ANY of these measures. Informed consent has not been offered; risks of these experimental vaccines have been withheld. Your administration has implemented coercion tactics to achieve your vaccination goals.
5. We the people charge you with fraud. It is fraud to enforce masks when there is scientific evidence they do not work. It is fraud to tell the public the Covid injections will keep them safe when there is scientific evidence that the injections are neither safe nor effective. It is fraud to enforce CDC recommendations when you cannot provide the public with peer reviewed studies proving the recommendations are legitimate. It is fraud to inappropriately reallocate Covid funds for mandate enforcement, testing centers, and other unapproved uses. Why does the city of Charleston have a contract with a testing center in North Charleston? It is fraud to act like you are working on behalf of Charleston citizens when our calls, emails and concerns go unanswered. The City Council members are not respecting the wishes of their constituents because they aligned with yours. The radical agendas your administration are approved by and benefit a small minority working with you to fund special interest groups that promote radical social engineering projects. The majority is NOT in favor of Critical Race Theory indoctrination of any kind, in any format. The Majority is not in favor of Racial Conciliation committees or programs. The majority is NOT in favor of reparations. The Majority is NOT in favor of removing Charleston monuments. The majority is NOT in favor of defunding the police. The Majority is NOT in favor of forced masks, vaccines or vaccine passports. It is fraud to pretend you represent the interests of the majority when you do NOT and have no intention to. It is fraud to use Covid to control and silence citizens by denying access to meetings in public buildings. It is fraud and divisive to enforce vaccine passports when taking the vaccine does not prevent you from getting or spreading Covid. It is fraud to kick a conservative City Council member out of the meeting for not wearing a mask while others sit chatting in the meeting unmasked. The hypocrisy of this fraud can be proved with photos of you at the maritime gala with hundreds of unmasked people only days after kicking the City Council member out of a meeting. You are a coconspirator in a fraud against the people for requiring masks at all. You have made it clear that you are NOT working for the majority or for the benefit of Charleston.
6. We the people charge you with abuse of power, unlawfully using police against its citizens, and domestic terrorism. You have pitted police against the citizens, using them as mandate enforcers, blocking entrances to public buildings, requiring masks, PCR tests, and vaccine passports in violation of HIPPA laws, the Constitution, South Carolina law, and the Nuremburg code. You have used power and authority in excess of your position. A local government CAN NOT DECLARE a state of emergency. You have tricked citizens to believe the mandates by hiring guards and ticket thugs to harass citizens to comply. You have governed using policies of intimidation and coercion. Domestic terrorism is defined as acts dangerous to human life in violation of the laws of a state or the United States, using intimidation and coercion of a civilian population by a government and its policy.
You are in violation of the following Federal laws:
A. Abuse of Power: Color of Law Section 1983 protects the deprivation of constitutional rights caused by state officers acting either without authority or, in violation of state law. Section 242 of Title 18 whoever willfully subjects any person in any state the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
B. The Equal Employment Opportunity the EEOC states that EUA protects employees seeking exemption from vaccination, Masks, PCR tests, and quarantine requirements, due to medical conditions or religious beliefs.
C. Section 802 of the USA Patriot Act. expanded the definition of terrorism to cover domestic terrorism to those who would do acts dangerous to human life that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.
D. 1st Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise of religion and the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
E. USC 5th Amendment it is illegal to deprive persons of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.
F. 18 USC 245 protects people from being intimidated from participating in or enjoying any benefit, service, privilege, program, facility, or activity provided or administered by the United States 18 USC 246 - U.S. Code Title 18 Crimes and Criminal Procedure 246 Deprivation of benefits whoever directly or indirectly deprives, attempts to deprive, or threatens to deprive any person of any employment, position, work, compensation, or other benefit provided for by any Act of Congress appropriating funds for work relief or relief purposes, on account of political affiliation, race, color, sex, religion, or national origin
G. 18 USC 241 - Conspiracy against rights If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
H. 18 USC 242 Crimes and Criminal Procedure deprivation of rights under color of law.
I. 18 USC 2331 802 domestic terrorism defined as activities dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion
J. 18 USC 2339 conspiring to commit acts of terrorism
K. 42 USC 1983 Civil action for deprivation of rights under color of any statute any citizen of the United States in may not be deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the state.
L. 42 USC 3617 discrimination for, objected to, participated in, or refused to participate in specific medical procedures where procedures are against religious or moral beliefs. If you have a corporate charter, and or accept any state or federal funds, or grants you must abide by the Constitution without discrimination.
M. USC 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights if two or more persons conspire to hinder, deprive, interfere, impede, or prevent, by force, intimidation, any person from their civil rights and liberties under the constitution. The attorney General has the authority to institute suits to protect constitutional rights in public facilities and public education.
N. 42 USC 1983 Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights. There is no policy, procedure, rule, law or mandate that can legally violate a citizens unalienable rights provided for in The Constitution. It is a violation of federal law to mandate citizens to undertake a medical procedure, experimental or not, as a condition of employment, or as a condition to access public meetings, or as a condition to attend public schools. Demanding disclosure of private medical information using PCR tests results as a condition to receive rights is in violation of HIPPA, FMLA and applicable state tort law principles, including torts prohibiting and proscribing invasions of privacy and battery.
O. 13-2921. Harassment;
P. Child Endangerment Act refers to an act or omission that renders a child to psychological, emotional or physical abuse.
Q. Universal Declaration on Human Rights provides all people with a standard of living without distinction of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language, religion, or political status. Every person has the right to life, liberty and security. Article 5 No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State Article 20 everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association. Article 21 everyone has the right of equal access to public service. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government. Article 26 Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children. Article 30 nothing in this declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms.
R. Chapter 1.3. Human Experimentation The Nuremberg Code of Ethics 1947 protects citizens of the state from unauthorized, needless, hazardous, or negligently performed medical experiments. Full disclosure about the drugs or devices utilized to include risks reasonably to be expected with an explanation of benefits must be given to the subject. There must be a disclosure of any alternative procedures, drugs or devices that might be advantageous to the subject. The subject must be given an opportunity to ask any questions and the consent must be written Section 24173 or 24178. Consent may be withdrawn at any time without prejudice. There must not be any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, or undue influence on the subject. The subject must be provided with the name of the sponsor or funding source, or manufacturer if the experiment involves a drug or device, and the organization, whose general aegis the experiment is being conducted. The subject must be provided with name, address, and phone number of an impartial third party, not associated with the experiment, to whom the subject may address complaints about the experiment.
To remedy this claim, we here by demand you rescind all mandates immediately. We demand our public buildings and meetings be opened up to its citizens without ANY restriction. We demand all covid directives to be removed from every city building and public properties. We demand you write an apology letter to our police for your administrations unlawful use of their services. We demand the city of Charleston allocate $20,000. within 45 days of this notice to the sheriff’s office to have our officers trained in advanced strategic and operational threat tactics offered through understandingthethreat.com additionally the city is to fund and pay for every officer to take a constitution on line course offered through patriotacademy.com
We demand your resignation within seven days of receipt if this letter. If you do not comply with these terms’ claims will be delivered to your Insurance companies, a copy of this intent will be distributed to the citizens and, we will file suit with Federal District Court.
*end*
What ever happened to this? Did they make any progress?
I applaud your initiative! However, some of your legal citations are flawed and some of your claims may appear to be over reaching. This would materially reduce your chances for success at a trial. Please consider raising funds for professional counsel or locating a qualified pro bono attorney.