A Few Of The Legitimate Concerns Regarding The Election And Voter Irregularities In Multiple Contested States.
As many main stream media sources and politicians continue to claim there is no evidence of fraud or irregularities, statisticians and state lawmakers point to unsettling numbers as further evidence
There seems to be a major divide between at least two distinct sects when it comes to the allegations of voter fraud and irregularities in the 2020 Presidential Election. Some of the numbers, however, from statisticians such as Matt Braynard seem to tell a very enlightening story. A story that can only be read one way: Something strange has happened with the election.
Just this week, a major hearing was held in Pennsylvania’s state legislature (which was largely ignored by media), where many witness statements were put forth and hard-hitting questions were raised. President Donald Trump’s lead attorney, Rudy Giuliani, answered the question of whether a forensic analysis could be done on the voting machines in question throughout Pennsylvania. His answer, an enthusiastic “absolutely,” was met with chants of “Do It, Do It, Do It,” from the crowd which had filled the chamber alongside the legislators and lawyers. Many of them were witnesses themselves, there to demand an honest shake when it comes to what they, themselves have seen, and what we have all had the ability to look into somewhat up to this point.
Just before midnight on Thanksgiving Eve, Sidney Powell presented two major lawsuits to the courts of both Georgia and Michigan. These lawsuits allege massive voter fraud, and name certain officials involved in the election commissions as defendants in each of the cases.
Much of this is extremely confusing to laymen such as myself. Translating Legalese into coherent English can be a daunting task sometimes. But amidst all of the “therefores,” “notwithstandings,” and antiquated Latin phrases, there are a few things we can take a look at that should be relatively easy to understand for almost anyone; except maybe leftists and media sources who aren’t interested in understanding, of course.
Matt Braynard is a statistician who worked with the 2016 Trump Campaign as their data and strategy director, and he has some interesting work to show. Here’s where we start to see the numbers telling us some disturbing things. He formed a group which identified 1.25 million individual voter issues and followed up on them by calling the associated phone numbers of those individuals and by using multiple databases to cross check their own information.
Some of the major things they looked at were:
Voters who illegally registered to vote using a PO Box rather than a home address as is required by law.
Those who either voted twice, or are registered on death indexes, yet still had a ballot cast in their name.
Voters who requested a mail-in ballot, used it, yet never had their ballot counted.
Voters who did not request a mail-in ballot, nevertheless had one requested and cast in their names.
Voters who had moved out of state, yet had a ballot cast in their name in the state from which they had moved.
Out of the number of issues this group looked into, the most notable were the voters who did not request ballots yet ballots had been sent out as if they had been requested, as well as the percentage of those who had denied voting at all, yet had ballots cast in their name. 5 out of the 6 states which have been called into serious question required citizens to request ballots prior to them being sent out, yet about half of those who requested ballots never sent them in. Ballots were universally mailed in Nevada, without a request for such being necessary.
Upon calling those people who were marked as having requested a ballot and were reported as having not returned it, Braynard and his team said that an astounding amount of them denied ever requesting a ballot in the first place, and still others who had, indeed, requested a ballot, had found out that even though they had returned it, it had never been counted.
Many lawsuits are being brought forth regarding the many issues that were exposed in this election. It is safe to deduce that most of these issues have stemmed from unprecedented as well as untested voting measures. Measures which were illegally and unconstitutionally mandated by secretaries of states and governors, rather than the legislatures as is demanded by both the Federal, as well as the State Constitutions themselves. Because of these inconsistencies and blatant issues within the electoral system this year, many people are finding it very hard to believe the lack of reporting on these matters. Many are also becoming concerned by how many people on the opposite side of the aisle are seemingly uninterested in even knowing if our electoral process has been corrupted. While many people see voting as the singular most important duty of a citizen in today’s society, just as many, it seems, are uninterested in the process and more concerned with the outcome.
This is obviously just another of the myriad examples proving that a large portion of the collectivist crowd in politics and bureaucracies alike which have taken to heart the “ends justify the means” attitude that has led many a nation down a tyrannical and dangerous path. Hopefully that is not a path we will continue to follow.
Be sure to like us on Facebook Here!
Follow us on Parler Here!
Donate to The Overton Report Here!
Sign up for THIS newsletter by putting your e-mail in, and receive exclusive stories, extended versions of The Overton Report, and Extras you won't find on ANY of our other platforms!
Let's beat this censorship and leftist tyranny together!!
I see nothing concerning California results. Is noone looking into this?
The results for CA were determined to be blue befor the mid-nation results were enve counted the first time. I am in a rural area And only know 2-3 Democrat voters. 2 of those voted Republican & received notices that their votes were not counted as the signatures could not be verified.
Are we just considered a hopeless case out here?